WUNRN

http://www.wunrn.com

 

SUBMISSION OF NGO “SHADOW REPORTS” FOR THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW OF A COUNTRY MAY HIGHLIGHT AND DRAW IMPORTANT ATTENTION TO SPECIFIC GENDER RIGHTS ISSUES.

 

THE FINAL REPORTS OF THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW WORKING GROUP MAY CONTAIN GENDER-FOCUSED TEXT THAT CAN BE VERY USEFUL IN NGO ADVOCACY.

 

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/UPRMain.aspx

 

Universal Periodic Review of UN Member States

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a unique process which involves a review of the human rights records of all UN Member States. The UPR is a State-driven process, under the auspices of the Human Rights Council, which provides the opportunity for each State to declare what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situations in their countries and to fulfil their human rights obligations. As one of the main features of the Council, the UPR is designed to ensure equal treatment for every country when their human rights situations are assessed.

The UPR was created through the UN General Assembly on 15 March 2006 by resolution 60/251, which established the Human Rights Council itself. It is a cooperative process which, by October 2011, has reviewed the human rights records of all 193 UN Member States. Currently, no other universal mechanism of this kind exists. The UPR is one of the key elements of the Council which reminds States of their responsibility to fully respect and implement all human rights and fundamental freedoms. The ultimate aim of this mechanism is to improve the human rights situation in all countries and address human rights violations wherever they occur.

 

https://gallery.mailchimp.com/cdbcf7344207a7d920c20eb2e/files/UPR_FullCycleCalendar_2nd_2.pdf

 

 

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/NgosNhris.aspx

 

Contributions and Participation of "Other Stakeholders" in the UPR (Last Update: 17 March 2015)

Through the Universal Periodic Review, the Human Rights Council will review, on a periodic basis, the fulfilment by each of the 193 United Nations Member States of their human rights obligations and commitments.

A review of a State is based on a national report prepared by the State under review; a compilation of United Nations information on the State under review prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); and a summary of information submitted by other stakeholders (including civil society actors), also prepared by OHCHR.

The review itself takes place in Geneva in a session of the Working Group on the UPR, which is composed of the 47 member States of the Human Rights Council. The review takes the form of an interactive dialogue between the State under review and the member and observer States of the Council. At the end of each review, the Working Group adopts an outcome document, which is subsequently considered and adopted by the Human Rights Council at a later session.

(a) Contributions to UPR documentation by “Other Stakeholders”, including civil society and national human rights institutions

The UPR process provides for the participation of all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs). Civil society actors and NHRIs can submit information which can be added to the “other stakeholders” report which is considered during the review. Information they provide can be referred to by any of the States taking part in the interactive discussion during the review at the Working Group meeting. NGOs can attend the UPR Working Group sessions and can make statements at the regular session of the Human Rights Council when the outcome of the State reviews are considered.

Stakeholders should follow the technical guidelines for stakeholders submissions issued by OHCHR, to send written contributions to UPR documentation.

Additional Technical guidelines for the submission of information by national human rights institutions (PDF) have also been issued by OHCHR.

Stakeholders’ submissions should be sent through the "On-line UPR submissions registration system" to register contributions for the UPR documentation from UN entities and stakeholders available (as of 4 March 2013) in the following link: https://uprdoc.ohchr.org and according to the deadlines below. Stakeholders should follow the Guidelines for the Use of the On-Line UPR Submissions Registration System".

Important note: all UPR submissions must be submitted and received (through the On-line system for registration of contributions) not later than the day of the given deadline (11:59 p.m.). Late submissions will not be considered. Should organizations encounter technical problems using the new system, please contact the UPR Submissions Helpdesk through the following email address: uprsubmissions@ohchr.org.

 

 

25th session (April/May 2016)
- session dates to be confirmed

21 September 2015
** tentative

Suriname, Greece, Samoa, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan, Hungary, Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan, United Republic of Tanzania, Antigua and Barbuda, Swaziland, Trinidad and Tobago, Thailand, Ireland

26th session (October/November, 2016)
- session dates to be confirmed

21 March 2016
** tentative

Togo, Syrian Arab Republic, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Iceland, Zimbabwe, Lithuania, Uganda, Timor Leste, Republic of Moldova, Haiti, South Sudan

 

UPR DOCUMENTATION – SEARCH BY COUNTRY - http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/Documentation.aspx

Scroll Down Website and Enter Country Name of Choice

 

 

EXAMPLE OF UPR SPECIFIC COUNTRY DOCUMENTATION – EXAMPLE OF KENYA

Go FIRST to Website Link and then Click on Documents of Choice: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/KESession21.aspx

 

Universal Periodic Review - Kenya

For first cycle reports of Kenya, please see here

Only contributions submitted in one of the United Nations official languages are admissible and posted on this webpage

Date of consideration: Thursday 22 January 2015, 09:00 am - 12:30 pm

National report 1 :

 AC | E | FR | S

            

 Compilation of UN information 2 :

 AC | E | FR | S

Summary of stakeholders' information 3 :

 AC | E | FR | S

Questions submitted in advance :

 E

Addendum 1 :

 E

Addendum 2 :

 E

Outcome of the review   :

 

Report of the Working group   :

 A | C | E | F | R | S

Addendum 1 :

 A | C | E | F | R | S

Related webcast archives

Flag of Kenya