WUNRN

http://www.wunrn.com

Description: FWRM Logo Color copy.jpg

Reaching Out, Reaching Women

By Menka Goundan

 

On April 24th 2015, the Fiji Women’s Rights Movement (FWRM) launched its report: “Reaching Out, Reaching Women: Assessing the Impact and Effectiveness of FWRM’s Citizenship Rights Awareness Training.” This report reflected FWRMs’ work on the European Union funded project Enhancing the Political Participation of Marginalised Women Voters.

 

The two target groups identified for the purpose of this project were Indo-Fijian women and young diverse women. Indo-Fijian women, or Fijian women of Indian descent, are part of the Indo-Fijian ethnic minority that forms 37.48% of the total 837,271 of Fiji’s population (Fiji Islands Bureau of Statistics 2012). Indo-Fijians have faced long-term discrimination, particularly in the political arena. Since the last military coup d’état in 2006, FWRM, which is a multi-ethnic, multicultural human rights-based organisation, noticed a steady decline in the participation of Indo-Fijian women in its workshops/campaigns/initiatives, as well as at the national decision-making level.  

 

 

Over Fiji’s history, young  women, which overlaps with Indo-Fijian women, have been similarly marginalised. They face multiple discrimination at the intersection of race, age, sexuality, place of origin and socio-economic status. However, with the growing importance of young voters and the national voting age at 18 years, the democratisation process was an opportunity for young women to become more politically engaged and influential citizens.

 

At the conclusion of the elections, FWRM developed monitoring and evaluation research that used a mixed method approach in collecting data, conducting face-to-face interviews with 348 women, seven focus group discussions involving 44 women, and nine key informant interviews. Respondents were chosen from three groups: Firstly, the direct recipients of FWRM’s training; secondly, participants that attended further training organised by the direct recipients; and finally, non-recipient, randomly selected respondents.

 

This research found that most recipients of FWRM’s training thought the training was useful or very useful, that is 81% of direct and indirect recipients.  FWRM had produced two publications to accompany the two phases of training, and 69% of all training recipients also found these materials to be useful or very useful.  However, the materials were particularly helpful for those receiving training indirectly, with close to 90% of those respondents finding the publications useful or very useful.

One of the objectives of the non-partisan FWRM media campaign and training was to empower women to attend campaign meetings as a means of making informed voting choices. The research showed FWRM made a significant impact here, as there was a higher percentage of women who received FWRM training directly that also reported attending campaign meetings, as compared to the indirect participants and those from the random selection. The survey showed 64% of direct participants attended campaign meetings, with only 42% attending such meetings from among indirect participants and down to 35% from the random selection. Thus FWRM’s training programmes were useful as a mechanism to politically empower women.

Despite the training, however, the majority of respondents did not vote for women. Only 27% of training recipients (both direct and indirect) voted for women, while 32% of the random respondents gave women their vote. This goes against expectations, and indicates that there are many barriers remaining to the full recognition of women’s leadership.

This research focused on the training and not the media component of the project, as the media campaign was monitored through different methodologies throughout the two years of the project.  However, this research does confirm the findings of the initial FWRM scoping study from 2013: that radio remains a prime medium for reaching women.  This finding had been incorporated into the design of the media campaign, that included multi-lingual radio advertisements and talk-back radio advocacy. Overall, FWRM’s work with marginalised women voters had a strong positive impact on these women citizens, and also raised FWRM’s profile in their communities around the country. 

The research team made six recommendations following the analysis of all the data:

1.                  Training needs to be frequent to further enhance development of knowledge and empower women to actively engage in political processes.

2.                  The ad-hoc cascaded approach was effective and needs to be strengthened and institutionalized for future projects like this. This could be in the form of building a network of trained community facilitators, who undergo comprehensive training-of-trainers.

3.                  FWRM should intensify its media campaign.  However, cost constraints and legislative barriers remain a challenge.

4.                  FWRM trainers continue to conduct evaluations of their training, including stronger follow-up.  For example, interviews with the women, particularly indirect participants, on the quality of the training.

5.                  FWRM and other women’s organizations, either independently or in collaboration, to intensify efforts to promote women candidates.  This could include the distribution of women candidates’ information to the wider public to ensure that female candidates’ profile gets more attention during the campaigning. However, their ability to do this may be constrained by current legislation.

6.                  Further develop gender-sensitive voter and civic education messages that highlight the capacities of women as candidates and political leaders.