WUNRN
SAFER CITIES FOR WOMEN & GIRLS
THROUGH A PLACE-BASED APPROACH
By Cynthia Nikitin
on - From
For many women and girls around the
world, just passing through a public space- a market, a crowded street or
riding the bus – is cause for great anxiety: the threat of sexual harassment
can be terrifying and have lingering psychological impacts and consequences. Unfortunately,
patterns of sexual abuse in urban public spaces are often seen as an
unavoidable part of urban life and generally speaking, not therefore recognized
as a problem either by local governments, enforcement agencies, or the public.
As part of PPS’ ongoing relationship
with the UN-Habitat, I flew to Cairo to join over 100 participants from
more than 12 countries who are working together to bring an end to sexual
harassment and violence against women and girls in public spaces at the 2011 UN
Women Designing Safe Cities with Women and Girls Stakeholder Planning Meeting. UN Egypt reported on the event.
In what spaces do women suffer most from sexual harassment?
Many, many topics were covered during the planning meeting- but what I found
most startling was the emphasis about public space as places where women suffer
most from sexual harassment and gender based violence. While most public
spaces in North American cities and those of the West in general – markets in
particular – are usually where one is most likely to find police, an on site
management presence, guards, and watchful neighbors, in the Global South and developing
countries, public spaces are the most dangerous places to be for women and
girls, and the least supervised as well.
Moreover, the problem of sexual violence and
gender based harassment in public spaces is a completely unrecognized problem
as opposed to domestic violence which has received global attention and is
widely recognized as a true threat to women and the stability of families and
communities. Programs such as Jagori’s successful “Ring
the Bell” campaign in New Delhi,
How Can Placemaking Help Prevent Sexual Harassment in Public Spaces?
Streets, squares, and parks, the focus of
our initial work at PPS, are often chaotic, poorly planned and maintained places
(if they exist at all in disadvantaged and under-resourced communities).
Once transformed, however, public spaces are anchors to safe,
inclusive and thriving urban centers.
Moreover, an improved public environment
can have a catalytic impact on a city: enhancing the delivery of basic social
and infrastructural services, driving the creation of economic and cultural
activity, expanding mobility options, and nurturing a cohesive, civil society
based upon mutual respect between men and women. Finally, as a grassroots
process, Placemaking provides a way to concretely engage people – especially
women and youth – in planning and implementing pubic space improvements in
their communities.
Change the Physical Environment to Change Behavior
What became clear to me over the 4 days
of the conference was how important it was to and perhaps even easier it might
be to make changes to the physical environment in order to influence behavioral
patterns and minimize the fear factor of sexual violence that haunts women the
world over. Instead, the goal of the conference organizers and the Safer Cities
for Women and Girls program is to change the mindset of men and boys, advocate
for and protect the rights of women, build the capacity of women to voice their
views, raise awareness of the seriousness of this issue (98% of all
foreign female visitors to Cairo cite being sexually harassed for example),
change cultural patterns and legal systems, educate police and local
governments to be more responsive to women’s concerns and build public trust in
these institutions.
But, by the end of the conference, and
impacted by my presentation and conversations over the course of the 4 days
event, there seemed to be an emerging recognition of the need to also address
the built environment and its impact on women’s feeling of safety and security
as a way of achieving on the ground immediate resolution of and means to begin
to deconstruct long held systemic belief systems and insensitive legal
structures. Redesigning bus stops and stations, train stations, public
markets, and all the places where women live and go through a grass roots
process which includes and empowers them could prove to be a much faster way to
bring about the changes that will make cities safer for women.
Rethinking Design to Include Safety Concerns
Partnerships with architects, urban
planners, transit authorities, landscape architects and planning agencies and
educating the design professions about ways to build projects from the outset
that consider women’s safety as a key element of their design program could set
the stage for and induce the psycho-social, behavioural, and cultural changes
that need to take place before women are truly able to enjoy public spaces and
engage fully in the civic life of their cities.
Breaking Down Silos for Stronger Safer City Initiatives
It is a question then of social movements
geared towards making on the ground, visible changes, lead by empowered
grassroots women, (which our friends at the Huairou
Commission has been championing and achieving for the past 15 years) vs. a
more considered, quantitative approach towards collecting analyzing and
disseminating data around women’s safety to federal and state governments,
local authorities and decision and policy makers. Both are valuable,
necessary approaches. However, when linked with designing, building,
programming, managing and supporting the upgrading of public spaces, the safer
cities initiatives themselves can become more effective more quickly .
Placemaking Dispatches from
I got to share Placemaking with a lot of
amazing people involved in Safer Cities Initiatives. Great walk around
the markets and new parks with UN-HABITAT gals and a
Why does it take a hurricane, a terrorist attack or a revolution to get
people to cooperate with their neighbors?
Memories from the Spring
are still fresh throughout
They came together to create their own
road blocks to keep out the bad folks – like looters and criminals who were taking
advantage of the lawless state of affairs. People trusted each other to
watch over their homes and to support each other in the event of attack by
gangs. During the 18 days between the revolution and Mubarik’s stepping down,
people were on 24 hour watch with women on the day watch and men taking over at
night.