WUNRN

http://www.wunrn.com

 

SUDAN - STONING EXECUTION STOPPED FOR MS. INTISAR SHARIF ABDULLA - RELEASE WITHOUT CHARGES

 

 

Geneva, 22 June 2012 - The International Secretariat of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) has received new information on the following situation in SUDAN.

 

New information

 

The International Secretariat of OMCT has been informed by a reliable source that Ms. Intisar Sharif Abdulla has been released unconditionally and without further charge. According to the information, the appeal court of Karari, OmdurmanKhartoum, overruled the previous verdict and ordered Intisar's immediate release, which was carried out in a silent manner on 20 June 2012.

 

OMCT welcomes the release of Ms. Intisar Sharif Abdulla.

 

Background information

 

OMCT had earlier been informed of the sentencing to death by stoning of Ms. Intisar Sharif Abdulla by the criminal court of Ombada, Omdurman city, in the district of Karthoum, Soudan.

 

According to the information received, on 13 May 2012, the criminal court of Ombada, headed by Judge Sami Ibrahim Shabo sentenced to death by stoning Ms. Intisar Sharif Abdulla on charges of adultery, under article 146 of Sudan’s 1991 Penal Code, which states that “whoever commits the offence of adultery shall be punished with: a) execution by stoning when the offender is married (Muhsan); b) one hundred lashes when the offender is not married (non-muhsan). She was sentenced without legal representation or translation

 

Ms. Intisar Sharif Abdulla, who is a mother of three children, was on death row with her then four month old baby and reportedly suffered from psychological distress and the harsh conditions. 

 

Remarks

 

OMCT wishes to thank all of the individuals and organisations that have taken action as a response to the urgent appeal. No further action is currently required on your part concerning this case. 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: WUNRN ListServe

To: WUNRN ListServe

Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 9:49 AM

Subject: Sudan - Stop Woman's Stoning Execution for Alleged Adultery

 

WUNRN

http://www.wunrn.com

 

 Inline image 1

STOP SUDAN STONING OF INTISAR SHARIF ABDALLAH

 

Women Living Under Muslim Laws (WLUML) and the Violence Is Not Our Culture (VNC) campaign call on Sudanese authorities to stop the execution of a woman condemned to stoning for alleged adultery.

 

Intisar Sharif Abdallah was sentenced by Judge Sami Ibrahim Shabo at Ombada criminal court in Omdurman on 22 April on charges of adultery, under article 146A of Sudan's criminal code.

 

Intisar was accused of having a relationship and becoming pregnant by a man who was not her husband. She was found guilty after an admission of guilt following torture and brutal beatings by her brother who instigated the case. According to reports, Intisar did not have access to a lawyer during her trial, and her accused lover remains un-convicted and walks free.

 

Intisar, who has three children, is being detained with her newborn baby. She is suffering from psychological distress and does not fully understand the nature of her sentence. In addition, she has a limited knowledge of Arabic and was denied a translator in court, an Amnesty International report stated. It was first reported that she is a minor but latest reports from civil society groups in Sudan confirmed her age as 20.

 

Sudan is a State party to a number of international human rights instruments. It signed and ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) in 1986. It has also signed and ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. A military coup in 1989 which harkened in the rule of its long-term and current president Omar al-Bashir introduced shariâ as the foundation of the country's jurisprudence and penal laws; a move widely perceived by many in Sudan as a pretext for the growth in stronghold by religious fundamentalist forces in the government.

 

The al-Bashir government passed the Sudanese Penal Code in 1991. A number of Articles in the Penal Code intended to curb women's enjoyment of their fundamental rights were introduced. These Articles have become the major impediments to Sudan's accession to the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). It is now one of the seven (7) remaining countries who have yet to sign and ratify the Convention.  One of these Articles is 146A, which provides capital punishment for married men and women who are found guilty of engaging in sexual relationships outside marriage.[1] The president must approve all death sentences before they are carried out. On 1 August 2010, the Sudanese Parliament called for the punishment of stoning to death to adulterers or those accused of having extra-marital affairs.[2] However, the Sudanese delegation during the Universal Period Review (UPR) of Sudan by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011 stated that the death penalty was practiced in the most restricted manner and imposed for the most serious crimes and it is associated with the right to practice religion as guaranteed by international human rights treaties. They also claimed that there are strict legal safeguards in trials of cases punishable by the death penalty.[3]

 

Sudanese women's groups view the sentencing of Intisar as a demonstration of the scale of discrimination against women and girls in the country: It is incredulous that the man with whom she has been accused is able to walk free showing explicitly the strong anti-woman sentiment and harsh management of family disputes that exists within both the Sudanese judicial system and in society.

 

We view stoning as an egregious abuse of human rights and in violation of Sudan's international human rights commitments under the ICCPR. It also constitutes a form of torture and is often accompanied by gender discrimination and unfair judicial processes. Although stoning is often justified in the name of Islam, the use of stoning today is wholly un-Islamic and religiously illegitimate. There is no mention of stoning in the Quran and many Muslim clerics, religious scholars, and political leaders have spoken out against the practice of stoning.

 

We demand that Intisar Sharif Abdallah be released immediately and unconditionally. We also call upon Sudanese authorities, including the Sudan Ministry of Justice and other relevant government bodies, to conduct an honest and thorough investigation into the case and correct all breeches in the judicial process.

 

The Sudanese government must reform the penal code and make it in line with its commitment to international human rights standards it has signed up to including the decriminalization of consensual sexual relations between adults and to ban capital punishment in all its forms. Stoning must never again be considered as a legitimate punishment for any crime.

 

The freedom of belief does not constitute the freedom to kill. "No excuse”including in the name of religion, culture, or traditions justifies any form of violence against women whether by the State or by private individuals or groups.

 

Take Action! If you want to take part in this action alert, please write immediately in Arabic, English or your own language to the following authorities:

 

1.President

HE Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir

Office of the President

People Palace

PO Box 281

Khartoum, Sudan

Email: info@sudan.gov.sd

Salutation: Your Excellency

 

2.Minister of Justice

Mohammed Bushara Dousa

Ministry of Justice

PO Box 302

Al Nil Avenue
Khartoum, Sudan

Email: info@sudanjudiciary.org

Salutation: Your Excellency

 

3.Chief Justice

Jalal al-Din Mohammed Osman

Ministry of Justice

Al-Jamha Street

Khartoum, Sudan

Salutation: Your Excellency

 

Please cite the following points in your appeals:

For the authorities

 

Please also send copies of your appeals to the Sudanese diplomatic missions in your country.



[1] Article 149 of the 1991 Criminal Code defined rape with reference to adultery, noting that this created confusion over evidentiary requirements for a prosecution, and that women are put at risk of facing prosecution for adultery where rape cannot not be proved.

[2] Summary prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/113/93/PDF/G1111393.pdf?OpenElement.

[3] See Report of the Sudan Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, A/HRC/18/16: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/146/04/PDF/G1114604.pdf?OpenElement.