WUNRN

http://www.wunrn.com

 

Social Science Research Network

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1900323##

 

FOR FULL TEXT, click above website and at top of page go to One-Click Download. 27 Pages - Free sign-in registration may be required.

 

Japan - Comfort Women - Norm Internalization through Transnational Legal Process: The Case of Individual Compensation for the Former Wartime Comfort Women


Naoko Kumagai



2011

APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper


Abstract:     
This paper will explore why the transnational legal process over the issue of wartime comfort women has not led to the legislation of individual compensation for them in Japan. It also poses a theoretical question on the internalization of the international norm of individual compensation for the victims of war crimes under Article 3 of the 1907 Hague Convention. The puzzle is that diverse transnational efforts to address the issue and persuade the Japanese government have not been successful, while legal scholarship suggests that transnational legal process functions to facilitate interactions among actors involved, including governments, advocate lawyers, judges, and scholars, to generate an agreed-upon interpretation of an international norm at issue in a particular context, and to effect internalization of the norm in domestic society.

The empirical study of the process and establishment of the system of the individual compensation from private donations from the Japanese people through the Asia Women’s Fund, as a product of the transnational legal process, demonstrates that three domestic conditions in Japan obstructed a successful establishment of an official system of individual compensation by the Japanese government. These three are the political condition surrounding the transnational legal process (the rightists’ staunch resistance to individual compensation and the leftist government’s willingness to compromise with the rightists), the cleavages in Japanese society, and some leftists’ dogmatism.

The study suggests the need for further exploration of the cases of transnational legal process in order to see under what circumstances it functions effectively to lead to an agreed-upon interpretation of an international norm and thus its internalization in domestic society.