******* N e w s l e t t
e r
******* | ||
|
|
N°5
December 2005 |
HOW
TO CONTACT US WRI’s Board of
Trustees Kate
Young, Chair Patsy
Robertson, Treasurer Victoria
Brittain Diana
de Deney Zarin
Hainsworth Eleanor
Stobart William
Wood, QC WRI’s
Auditors F.
W. Smith, Riches & Co, 18
Pall Mall London
SW1Y 5LU How
to contact us or WRI 1-3
Berry Street London
EC1V 0AA or Telephone:
+44.(0)20.7253.5504 www.widowsrights.org CONTENTS Editorial
2 About
WRI
3
News
from our partners
4-6
Fighting fund
4
WiDO, Nigeria: new cases
5
WOP, Uganda: Hope for widows
6
Recent
articles and events of
interest
7-14
Women’s
Inheritance: next steps - India 7-8
Women’s Inheritance Rights – Nigeria
9
Role of Conflict Widows 10
Success Stories – Ghana
11-12
Dr. Giri Speaks at the University of New England 13
A case study: Position
of Mrs X -India
14
A Poem: because I can read – mother to daughter 14
|
This is the last e-newsletter for
this year. We hope that you have enjoyed receiving them.
As this is the traditional season
for gifts giving in our culture we are asking for any reader who can to support
WRI with a gift.
HOW YOU CAN HELP WRI
If you can give us
information about recent changes in
legislation in your country which protects widows from discrimination, or new
social policies which are aimed at supporting widows who live in poverty, this
is of great help to our research effort. Just send us an email with the
details.
If you can provide
us with really good statistics
about the number of widows in your country, whether they are in rural or urban
areas, and whether they are between 15-29, 30-59 or 60 and over, this is also
very useful information.
If you have good and detailed
information about struggles widows in your country are waging, or victories they
have won through the courts, please let us know. All this information is very
helpful for us in compiling our picture of the position and condition of widows
and what needs to be done by governments and international agencies to remedy
social injustices.
It you would like to help
us support more widows groups,
send us a donation, or ask us for a
gift aid declaration if you are a UK tax payer.
You can also log onto our website where there is a donation
facility.
Have a festive
season!
The
Trustees
A
B O U T W R
I
Widows’
Rights International supports organisations in South and West Asia and
Africa working for social justice and human rights for widows including:
q
Right
to keep their home and property q
Right
to inheritance and land ownership and possession q
Right
to keep their children q
Right
not to be forcibly married to the dead husband’s
kin q
Right
to work outside the home Traditional
customs in many developing countries, especially in Asia and Sub-Saharan
Africa - which can deprive a widow of home and livelihood or subject her
to social ostracism - lead to dire poverty for widows and their
children. Even
when modern laws exist to prevent these abuses, ignorance of the law, or
cultural habits, impede access. Widows
are young as well as old, because of: *Child
marriage
*HIV/Aids
*Civil strife WRI
works: *
to promote the recognition of widows’ special
vulnerability
* to combat negative social attitudes which lead to their
isolation, exploitation and poverty
* to bring these practices to an end: WRI
mobilises action by:
*International organisations
*National governments
*Legal and other civil society organisations WRI
offers resources for:
·
Capacity
building and networking ·
Advice
and information for national groups, especially through our
website ·
Research
into the status and condition of widows and their
children ·
Legal
action for widows’ rights ·
Assistance
to raise international awareness of degrading
practices ·
Advocating
creation of international instruments protecting widows’
rights ·
Supporting
regional meetings to promote social justice for
widows Financial
assistance may be available for: *pioneering
activities by and for widows which provide examples of best
practice *activities
designed to establish legal precedents; heighten public awareness; repeal of
laws inimical to widows *action
to influence international agencies to condemn practices which deny widows
their rights *action
to train widows and legal personnel in rights
awareness
|
N
E W S F R O
M O U R PARTNERS
T
H E F I G H T I N
G F U N
D
Three years ago we set up The
Fighting Fund for Widows Rights with funds from the Swedish aid agency SIDA. The
idea for this came from listening to the stories told by participants at the
first international conference on widows rights which we organised in 2001. Although in many countries laws do
exist to protect widows from customary practices which deprive them of access to
land, property and a livelihood, it is usually very difficult for widows to get
legal protection. Our partners identified the need to have resources to help
widows challenge customary but often illegal practices as a priority.
To date we have three Fighting
Fund partners – one of them, WiDO in Nigeria, has developed an interesting and
innovative method of support for widows.
As soon as WiDO gets to hear of a
case of mistreatment of a widow, their Vanguard Team goes to her village and
starts to negotiate with the widow’s husband’s kin as to her rights to home,
children and livelihood. The
Vanguard Team is composed of a good negotiator, someone who is fully conversant
with the law, a photographer and a driver.
They involve as many of the local notables – village chief, elders,
teachers – as possible so that the agreement eventually reached is more likely
to be honoured. The Vanguard Team
revisit the widow after some time has lapsed since the agreement to make sure
all is well and that she is not suffering from other forms of
discrimination.
WiDO are greatly aided in their
work by the existence of State level legislation prohibiting discrimination
against widows and widowers; WiDO has translated the main provisions of the bill
into the local language and published it in a simple illustrated booklet. The Vanguard Team make sure the notables
have their copy of the booklet. In
their new project proposal they envisage training 4 community focal persons
based in rural Enugu State, and giving them each a mobile phone so that WiDO
will hear of abuses of widows’ rights rather quickly. The Vanguard Team will
then be able respond much more rapidly before a widow’s possessions and children
are dispersed.
WiDO also hold an annual Widows
Friendly Day at which widows, collaborating NGOs, lawyers and well wishers hear
about recent cases, and commit themselves to spreading the word that abusing
widows is against the law.
One
of our Partners, WiDO (Widows Development Organisation),
Nigeria
And
another Mrs. C.
came to WiDO in November, 2004 to report that she was homeless
because of disputes with her husband’s family. Before his
death in 2002.relations were unsatisfactory because he
constantly brought girls to the house, and ordered her to
sleep on the floor while he slept on the bed with the
girls. At a
meeting with welfare officers, her late husband had accused
her of flirting with other men and denied that he was
unfaithful and the paternity of their daughter.
Before
his death, it had been agreed that Mrs C. would stay in the
matrimonial home while he worked on and lived in a new house
that was being built. On completion of the work, the younger
brother of her late husband refused her access to the house
and threatened to kill her, forcing her to sleep outside for
three days. Because of these
disputes, Mrs C. went to stay with her parents.
. In 2002,
her husband became ill and pleaded with her to return to the
matrimonial home, but her parents would not allow her to
return. After his death, none of his relative came to inform
her. Her son told her and when she went to the house, his
sisters refused her access until his remains were brought home
for burial.
After the
burial rites, she was instructed by her late husband’s elder
brother to go back to her parent’s house, but her elder
brother and her son pleaded with her to undergo the full
mourning rites, which she did. After these rituals, her late
husband’s sister warned her not to come into her matrimonial
house and asked the family members to threaten her with
machetes and sticks, describing her as an enemy. Her husband’s elder
brother then stated that, as the next of kin, everything that
belonged to his late brother was his. This included a house,
a car and two motor-cycles. Social welfare officials had also
decided that the late husband’s salary should be divided into
three so that his family members could have a share, but did
not deal with the question of the new
house. Mrs C.
came to complain to WiDO. Her children, her husband’s property
and her life were at stake. The Vanguard team went to speak to
the Traditional ruler and in-laws. WiDO decided to approach a
lawyer for assistance. Eventually
in October 2005 agreement papers were signed allowing Mrs C.
to move back in her matrimonial home with her children after
several months of neglect, abandonment and
disinheritance. Mrs E. is
the second wife of late Mr E. who died in 1999. She has been disposed of
her farm land and economic trees assigned to her children by her late
husband Mr E. Her step son
B (the son of the first wife) who is now the head of the family has been
the major party in the dispute. B. claims
that Mrs E. deserted her husband and her matrimonial home years before her
husband died. Mrs E. denies this and claims that she left after a very
serious quarrel with her husband and after being beaten up by B. However
she returned after her husband died and observed the traditional mourning
rites in her matrimonial home. Thereafter she was unwelcome and her two
sons were forcefully taken away from her. She decided to return to her
father’s compound. WiDO sent
out the Vanguard team to verify the allegations on both sides. This was
followed by letters to B. concerning the unlawful custody of Mrs E’s
children. He replied by writing a fake letter pretending to be from Mrs
E’s daughter who denied writing the letter. WiDO has
since been able to get her two sons back. One was discovered to be
disabled after the people he was sent to live with physically abused him.
He is now unable to walk properly. Mrs E.
currently lives in a poor place made of sticks and with a thatch roof. On
his barrister’s advice, B. was in favour of an amicable settlement of the
matter. B and his brother have agreed to hand over a portion of land and
economic trees to Mrs E. An agreement was drawn up by the lawyer for all
parties to sign. In September
2005, the papers were signed by B. and his brother, on one hand and by Mrs
E. on the other hand In the presence of the lawyer and the Vanguard team.
Then after further help from the Church and of Mrs E. brother, B. handed
over a large parcel of land to Mrs E. under our supervision. In total Mrs
E. got two plots of land and thirty two palm trees. |
If
you are interested in knowing the outcome of these cases, please contact us at
enquiries@widowrsrights.org.
GRACE' S
STORY
My husband
died and left me with two children. He had been sick on and off but strong
enough to dig. To survive. Then one time he became very sick for we used to grow
cassava; millet, cotton and we were able only a few days and died. I believe he
was poisoned because his stomach swell and his skin turned very dark.
The most terrible
thing that can happen to any woman is to lose a husband. I live with my
widowed mother-in-law in the same compound. Life is hard; it was my late husband
who was supporting both of us. The biggest problem I have is accommodation. My
house is in a bad state. My husband had intended to repair it but unfortunately,
he fell sick before he did it.
When my husband
passed away, the Director and the Co-ordinator of Woman of Purpose came to pay
their condolences to the family and me. When they saw the state of my house,
they promised that through the project HOPE FOR WIDOWS, they would help me with
the repair of the roof. I am very grateful because the roof was repaired before
the heavy rains started, otherwise, the whole house would have fallen down.
I am also happy
that they were able to talk to my late husband's relatives about the rights of
widows and told them that they should support me as much as they can. I am happy
with this organisation and I hope that they will help many widows because there
are a lot of problems faced by widows. A few weeks after my husband's death, I
discovered that I was pregnant. Now I am quite heavy with another child and I do
not know what to do but I will just leave everything to God. I do not want to
think a lot about the future. Sometimes I wish I had also died but again when I
think of my children I pray to God to keep me so that I can bring them up. I
have seen many orphans suffering a lot and I would not like my children to
suffer like that. Even if I cannot give them much, we shall survive with the
little I get. My mother-in-law is a good woman, she is a Christian. She helps me
care for the children when I go to dig. We cook together and eat whatever we
can. I pray she remains like that.
Sometimes when the
husband dies, everyone turns against the widow - adding hurt to
injury.
Women’s
inheritance: next steps –
India |
The Indian
Express
Monday, October 17,
2005
Bina
Agarwal,
Author
of A field of her own
The livelihood
and empowerment prospects of millions of women who depend on agriculture for
survival are affected by their legal rights in land. For many these prospects
have been enhanced by the recent Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005(HSAA)
which deleted the gender discriminatory clause on agricultural land. But this
benefits only Hindu women, leaving intact the disabilities facing non-Hindu
women, especially Muslim and tribal women — something that should concern all of
us who work for gender justice.
Muslim women in
India fall under The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. With
this, the Shariat superceded “custom or usage to the contrary” for all property,
except agricultural land, as the basis of personal law for Muslims in
undivided India, except J&K.
Earlier, Muslims (like most Hindus before the 1956 Hindu Succession Act)
were governed by a mosaic of local customs, laws and practices, some in sync
with the Shariat, most at variance with it. The ’37 Act, by abrogating custom,
enhanced most Muslim women’s rights, since typically customs (except among
matrilineal Muslims, as in Kerala), were highly discriminatory: some entirely
excluded daughters, others placed them (and widows) very low in the succession
order. In contrast, under the Shariat, a daughter and widow cannot be excluded
by any other heir and are protected by the overall testamentary restrictions,
even though their shares are always lower than men’s. However, the ’37 Act,
excluded a critical form of property: agricultural land. Section (2) provides
that:
“Notwithstanding
any custom or usage to the contrary, in all questions (save questions relating
to agricultural land) regarding intestate succession, special property of
females, including personal property inherited or obtained under contract or
gift, or any other provision of Personal Law, marriage, dissolution of marriage,
including Talaq, Ila, Zihar, Lian, Khula and Mubaraat, maintenance, dower,
guardianship, gifts, trusts and trust properties, and wakfs (other than
charities and charitable institutions, and charitable and religious endowments)
the rule of decision in cases where the parties are Muslims shall be the Muslim
Personal Law (Shariat).”
Later the
southern states extended the ’37 Act to include agricultural land by deleting
the phrase “save questions relating to agricultural land”. TN, Karnataka and AP
did so in ’49. Kerala followed in ’63. Elsewhere, however, succession to
agricultural land continues to depend variously on customs, tenurial laws, etc,
with differing implications across the unamended states.
|
|
In some, e.g.,
Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Bengal, there was no strong presumption in favour of
custom even before the ’37 Act. Here, even without amendment, the Shariat could
be presumed to cover agricultural land.
Continued
…
The same holds
for the parts of AP and Karnataka which were earlier in the former Hyderabad
state, and where custom at variance with Mohammedan law was not admitted even
before 1937. But in many other states, e.g., Delhi, Haryana, HP, Punjab, UP and
J&K, highly discriminatory tenurial laws and customs, at considerable
variance with the Shariat, continue. These virtually exclude women from rights
in agricultural land. For instance, in UP, with one-sixth of India’s population,
non-Hindu women’s land rights are still subject to the UP Zamindari Abolition
and Land Reforms Act ’50. Section 171 of the Act, which defines succession to a
man’s land, gives primacy to the male lineal descendants in the male line of
descent. Only in their absence can a widow qualify. Daughters come lower.
Tenurial laws in Delhi, Punjab, Haryana, HP and J&K give similar primacy to
male heirs. This is contrary to the rights promised to Muslim women by the
Shariat.
Notably, on
agricultural land, Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim women are better off. In
Pakistan the ’37 Shariat Act was superceded by later laws. Finally, the West
Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1962 included
agricultural land and extended the Shariat to all of West Pakistan, except
‘Tribal Areas’ in the NWFP. The Act entitled Muslim women to inherit all
property, including agricultural, with shares as prescribed by the Shariat.
Pakistani women’s groups played a key role in this reform.
Muslims of East
Pakistan (now Bangladesh), however, continued to come under the ’37 Shariat Act.
But here women were not disadvantaged since even before this Act customs
contrary to Islamic law were not enforced in (undivided) Bengal: here the
Shariat (by presumption) applies also to agricultural land, as outlined in
Mulla’s Principles of Mohammedan Law 1990, and confirmed by my
discussions with Bangladeshi lawyers.
Surely in India
too it is time to remove this anomaly. Deleting the phrase “save questions
relating to agricultural land” in Section 2 of the Shariat Act, would bring all
property, including agricultural, in line with the Shariat. Although, women
would be entitled to smaller shares than men, still this amendment would go a
long way in enhancing Muslim women’s rights in this critical livelihood source.
Vast numbers of Muslim women depend on agriculture for subsistence, many as
de-facto household heads, as more men move to non-farm jobs. Indeed one of the
earliest grassroots demands by Indian women for land rights came from poor
Muslim women in West Bengal who, in ’79, told their panchayat: “Please go and
ask the government why when it distributes land, we don’t we get a title? Are we
not peasants?” These women and millions like them deserve an answer. But
government land distribution is limited, and inheritance remains the main source
for women’s land access.
On other
aspects of inequality, the only Muslim countries with full gender equality in
inheritance laws are Turkey and Somalia. In some others, like Bangladesh, women
have debated whether the constitution should define personal law. My aim here
is, however, more modest and the reform suggested vis-ŕ-vis agricultural land is
doable within the purview of the Shariat. The precedent for such amendment
already exists in southern states.
Tribal women
are the second major category facing substantial disabilities in inheritance.
Given the non-codification of their laws, tribal communities are governed by
customs which (except under matriliny) discriminate against women. And even the
limited customary land rights many tribal women enjoyed historically have been
eroding. Attempts at gender-unequal codification in some north-eastern states
have been opposed by women’s groups there. It is critical that any codification
is along gender-equal lines.
There is a
window of opportunity today for reform-minded political leaders, activists and
intellectuals to work together, to correct historically embedded gender
disabilities. Let this chance not be missed.
The
writer is professor of economics, Institute of Economic Growth,
Delhi
Women’s Inheritance Rights
in Nigeria
Transformative
Practices
Vanessa Emery JD/MSW, former
student of the University of Toronto
Nigeria, with its complex
tripartite legal system, faces a particularly challenging legal situation in the
face of the Aids pandemic in maintaining a harmonious and equitable balance
amongst its over 250 different diverse peoples. With an HIV prevalence rate of
5.4% amongst the adult population, and approximately 3,600,000 adults and
children currently HIV+[1] the ability of the
legal framework to provide support to those affected needs to be critically
assessed.
Widows rights are a good
entry point into a critical re-examination of Nigeria’s legal framework. Widows,
as a set of individuals who are particularly vulnerable in the face of HIV, are
beginning to come to public attention. As many AIDS widows have limited rights
to inheritance, their ability to subsist in a land-based economy is placed in
jeopardy. At the same time, widows play a pivotal role in caring for AIDS
orphans and sick relatives.
Research into the complex topic of widow’s inheritance rights is
therefore a necessary step in developing a holistic approach to combating the
pandemic.
The paper has five sections.
In the first section a normative framework is developed which recognizes that
solutions must come from within a cultural framework that stems from the people
themselves. Working with community
leaders to reinterpret customary law for example has greater legitimacy than
attempts to impose reform from above.[2] The importance of the cultural
transformation approach is stressed. While culture may be seen as a barrier to
reform, it can more fruitfully be seen as a dynamic site of tension and
resistance that can provide for differing interpretations and potentialities to
expand opportunities for women. While both customary laws and the common law
have developed to protect particular world views, they must evolve in order to
remain relevant to the needs of the people.
The second section focuses on
the interaction between common law, customary law and sharia law as the living
law of the nation. It also explains how land and marriage impact upon the bundle
of rights that individuals possess regarding inheritance. The third section
surveys inheritance laws for both testate and intestate succession in all three
systems, and the fourth section provides a brief survey of the key social
factors that impact upon widows’ ability to access, enforce, and advocate for
inheritance rights.
The final section explores
both top-down attempts at reform; through legislative reform, adoption of
international conventions and judicial intervention, and grass roots options,
focusing on cultural transformation rooted in the work of women in developing
normative community frameworks, local judicial processes, and revitalizing
customary values. The author
argues that there is no simple prescription for how to make cultural
transformation work. Any successful approach must be multi-faceted in order to
engage with different audiences and loci of power, and also negotiate difficult
value judgements about the relationship between women, human rights, and
culture.
This is a shortened version. Vanessa Emery’s
report is 76 pages long. If you
would like a copy please send your request to
vanessa.emery@utoronto.ca
Role
of Conflict Widows in Healing a Hurting World
Declaration
India
Women's United Nations Report Network (WUNRN) Workshop Organised by The Guild of Service and
Supported by UNIFEM
Preamble
This
assembly of organisations and individuals involved in the process of prevention
of conflict, reconstruction, peace reconciliation and empowering widows and
other victim groups reiterates that:
While entire communities suffer the
consequences of armed conflict and terrorism, women and girls are particularly
affected because of their status in society as well as their sex".
Women
are on the one hand, the main civilian victims of conflicts, they are, on the
other hand, often powerless to prevent them, excluded from the negotiating
tables when it comes to their resolution and marginalised in
the
post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation efforts. The general exclusion
of women from decision-making positions prior to, during and following violent
conflict reinforces their victimization.
Women
are more than just victims, they are fighters. Widows are survivors. Mothers are
peace builders.
A
vast majority of women affected by conflict are widows as a direct or indirect
consequence of the violence. To the process of peace building they bring
sensitivity tempered by their personal loss, a sense of immediacy
since their
families' futures are at stake and surviving skills against all odds. These
qualities once tapped while accelerating the ownership of the process of
reconstruction will help them individually to overcome their
personal
traumas.
The
peace-building process comprises several stages including conflict prevention,
conflict resolution and post-conflict peace-building and reconstruction.
Sustainable peace requires the full participation of women
particularly those
affected by conflicts at each of the stages of the peace process.
The
assembly called on governments to provide a range of diverse support for women
and widows. To see the full declaration please go to our website
www.widowsrights.org.
SUCCESS
STORIES ON
NEGATIVE
TRADITIONAL AND CULTURAL PRACTICES
By
Madam Betty Ayagiba
National
Director, Widows and Orphans Ministry, Ghana
The
Widows and Orphans Ministry (WOM) carried out research on inheritance in four
communities near Bolgatanga in the Upper East Region of Ghana and uncovered the
following human rights issues among widows and reasons for their
poverty:
·
Widows
must bear the cost of the husband’s funeral and some widows even come to the WOM
office to borrow money to perform their husband’s funeral
rites.
·
The
ritualist takes the clothes the widow wears during the funeral
rites
·
Widows
have to feed the ritualist with nutritious diet and other items like cooling
drinks, alcohol, and tobacco (depending on what she/he takes) during the course
of the funeral
·
Widows
must supply the ritualist with all kinds of foodstuffs to take home after the
funeral
·
The
widow is stripped naked during the funeral
·
The
widow is bathed naked before the crowd of mourners
·
The
widow is forced to choose somebody in the husband’s family to marry and to
continue bearing children to the dead husband’s name
·
A
relative of the deceased inherits his property including the widow
herself
Recommendations
from the research were that WOM should work with Chiefs, opinion formers and
group leaders to bring about change in attitudes. So WOM
enlisted the support of the Commission of Human Rights and Justice (CHRAJ) and
Women and Juvenile Unit (WAJU) to run a series of workshops to educate the
community on property laws, to adopt positive cultural practices and to
eliminate or change negative cultural practices. Facilitators used various
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools to ensure the success of the
workshops
The
workshops brought together more than one thousand participants from four
communities and included Chiefs, elders, opinion formers and group leaders, and
widows.
At
each workshop for the chiefs, community men and women, the Director of WOM gave
participants the findings of the research on the causes of widows’ poverty,
after which widows shared with the community their experiences when their
husbands died.
At
one location a widow spoke of how she was driven out of the house she and her
husband had toiled and built, and slept under a tree for three months. Another
widow told of how her dead husband had left bullocks yet his relatives are using
these bullocks to farm whilst she and her child weed with their hands. Another woman could not control her
tears as she told the story of how she and her children were maltreated; she
said her children refused to eat food for four days.
A
young widow confessed how a young man was seriously looking at her when they
stripped her naked. She asked the man why he was looking at her and he replied
that he felt bad for her. Another
widow said she refused to strip naked at the first of her husband’s funeral
rites, but then
everybody
in the village were against her saying that she had committed adultery and
killed her husband which was the reason why she refused to strip naked. So during the final funeral rites she
had to strip herself naked.
One widow told of her pain when her children saw her nakedness at her
husband’s funeral.
One
ritualist said that they could only stop these practice if they are supported to
rear goats or guinea fowls instead of performing funeral rites for
employment.
Continued
…
The second part
of the workshop on educating chiefs, community men and women on property law was
handled by WAJU and CHARJ. The facilitators were taken to the four villages and
the community was educated on laws concerning inheritance of property.
Participants were also told there are laws protecting women and children and,
therefore, a person who dehumanizes another person’s dignity could be reported
for punishment.
In
our view this style of workshop is the best to combat or reduce negative
cultural practices. The community was exposed to the plight of the widows and
some of the practices such as drinking of concoctions made from contaminated
leaves worn by a widow during a previous funeral.
When
we were asked to send our contribution to the U.N Secretary General’s paper on
violence against women, we mentioned that this is an effective method to reduce
violence against widows.
TWO
SuccessFUL OUTCOMES
·
A
workshop was held in Kongo. After
the workshop the Kongo Chief and all the elders agreed that from the day onward
they would not strip widows naked during funerals and would end the drinking of
any concoctions. They also agreed that after the death of the husband, the widow
and her children should use the husband property and when a widow’s daughter
gets married, a portion of the bridewealth or the cows should be given to the
mother. One of the elders also
spoke of how only girls are trained in cooking and doing all household jobs
leaving the boys behind. All agreed
that boys should also be trained in cooking in the home.
Kongo was
exceptional because they took immediate action to stop some of these negative
funeral practices. The other three villages asked for time to think about
possible changes but at the same time there was no doubt of how badly they felt
to the exposure.
·
BA,
about 30 years old, was her husband’s second wife, and they had three
children. His first wife had five
children. Three years ago he died after a short illness.
During
his lifetime BA’s husband was able to put up six rooms for himself and his two
wives. After his death, life was so hard for BA that she had to move to town to
look for a job to take care of her children. Through the WOM she was trained in
baking bread.
One
day she decided to visit her in-laws and to clean her rooms; while she was
sweeping, her husband’s brother came in and asked why she had come to the house.
He beat her so severely that she had to go to hospital. She reported this to WOM, and he was
arrested and imprisoned. After two months he was given the option of paying a
five hundred thousand cedis fine or spending a further six months in prison.
This
case has scared a lot of in-laws from beating widows.
Dr.
Mohini Giri of The Guild Service, Delhi
at
the University of New England
October
27, 2005
By Laura Slap-Shelton, Psy.D.
Dr.
Mohini V. Giri addressed a standing room only crowd of approximately 200 at the
University of New England (UNE) in Biddeford, Maine on October 27, 2005.
Her appearance was co-hosted by GriefandRenewal.Com and UNE’s Office of
Multicultural Studies and Women’s Studies Departments. As people were coming
into the lecture, excerpts from White Rainbow, the new film about widows
in Vrindavan, were playing. Dr. Giri opened her talk noting that what happens to
women in India is relevant to people in America, particularly as technology
brings us all closer together. Throughout the talk she emphasized the global
importance of the problems faced by the widows and other marginalized women.
Using a power point presentation she reviewed the status of widows in India. Her
first person portrayal of what happens to a woman when she is widowed brought
home to the audience, mostly female, the reality of the Indian woman’s plight
when her husband dies. Dr. Giri described the transformation of a vibrant woman
to a non-person. “Imagine in front of a group of my relatives as large as this
one”, she said, “my bangles are smashed, my hair is shaved, my bindi removed.”
She went on to state that widows are allowed only one meal a day and are not
allowed to eat food with spices. They are forced to wear white saris. Saddest of
all is that they are often removed from their children and families, and
abandoned. She described how the Guild of Service has been helping to
connect the widows to their now grown children in recent years. Showing pictures
of widows in different Guild of Service homes, she described three types of
widows: religious widows, war widows, and riot widows. The audience responded to
her talk with questions about the legal protections for widows vs. society’s
practices, the technology boom in India, widowhood in cities vs. rural areas,
child brides and widows, AIDS, and even Indira Ghandi. Dr. Giri reported on
several pieces of legislation she introduced to parliament which will help
widows in her country, but emphasized the need for the culture and particularly
men’s attitudes to change so that the laws will be enforced. Pointing out that
even in the United States only a small percentage of women are in Congress, she
spoke about her goal of having a mandate to have 33 percent of India’s
Parliament allocated to women. In discussing women in leadership, Dr. Giri noted
that she is the daughter-in-law of one of India’s presidents and could have
accepted a ministerial position in the government. Instead she chose a path of
leadership which allowed her to follow her heart “and bring many women along
with her.”
A
case sent by Mr Anukul Nayak, Managing Trustee of Sradhanjali Charitable
Trust
Bhubaneswar,
India.
For
centuries women not only in India but all over the world have been treated as
occupying a secondary position to men. In India many social reformers look up
the cause of injustice against women. As a result during the colonial
administration period laws like Abolition of Sati (1829), Widows Remarriage Act
(1856), Civil Marriage Act (1872) etc. were enacted
These
laws need to be activated and utilised by concerned interests. The first requirement is awareness of
the law by widows themselves and how to use it.
In
Bhubaneswar, Orissa 3 years back a
lady was tortured by her in-laws because of the sudden demise of her
husband. After the expiry of her
husband Mrs. X tried to stay in her home but to her ill fate she was compelled
to vacate her late husband’s house with her small kid. Now the house is being enjoyed by her
in-laws.
Although
she tried to use the shelter of law to fight against her in-laws to get her
property back there were many rumours that her husband had gifted the said
property to his younger brother who is insane. The question is who will take care of
the wealth if the younger brother is an insane man and also why the property is
not going to the widow who has a small child who will ultimately inherit the
property. The case is at the court
of law but unfortunately Mrs .X is unable to pay the fees to her Attorney to
fight the case against her in-laws.
See
the cases histories of our partner ASHISH for similar
injustices.
A
POEM
BECAUSE
I CAN READ - MOTHER TO DAUGHTER
Because
I can read,
I
can understand. I can write a letter.
I
can fill out a job application.
I
can finally get off welfare.
Because
I can read,
I
can learn. I can help my daughter
With
her homework.
I
can inspire her to be better.
I
can be a role model.
Because
I can read,
I
can succeed, I can
Contribute.
I can live
My
life without fear,
Without
shame.
I
can be whatever
I
want to be.
Because
I can read.
[1] UNAIDS, 2004 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic,
Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS
estimates and data, as of end 2003,
(July 2004). Accessed at http://www.unaids.org/bangkok2004.
[2] For development of this framework, see Abduhalli A. An-Nai’im, ed., Cultural Transformation and Human Rights in Africa (New York: Zed Books Ltd., 2002).