WUNRN
PAKISTAN NATIONAL ASSEMBLY - BILLS INTRODUCED FOR
WOMEN'S RIGHTS
ISLAMABAD, Aug 8: It was a rare women’s day in the National Assembly on
Tuesday when they and their male allies overcame party affiliations and
conservative obstructions to introduce three private bills to promote women’s
rights.
After stormy proceedings centring on whether they conformed to
Islamic teachings or not, the lower house majority voted for the introduction of
the two bills seeking to protect women from domestic violence and a third
seeking to amend a controversial Hadood ordinance about rape and
adultery.
The bills, authored mainly by women members from both sides of
the political divide, will now be considered by a house standing committee
before coming back to be debated and voted upon for passage.
Speaker
Chaudhry Amir Hussain earlier cut short a debate on another opposition private
bill seeking to allow one-dish wedding meals and deferred it until the next
private members’ day on August 15 after it seemed set for passage despite
divisions across party lines because of formal support announced by the ruling
coalition.
The speaker’s rostrum was twice besieged by opposition and
ruling coalition members seeking deletion of objectionable remarks or to press a
point during furores.
The main Prevention of Domestic Violence Bill
seeking to make provisions for the protection of women, children and family was
moved by Mrs Sherry Rehman of the People’s Party Parliamentarians (PPP) while
another — The Domestic Violence Against Women (Prevention and Protection) — by
Mrs Mehnaz Rafi of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League who got her draft to be
clubbed with the first one.
Mrs Rehman said her proposed legislation,
which has been waiting on the house roster for a year, was needed because there
was no provision now in the Pakistan Penal Code against domestic violence while
women frequently became victims of offences such as acid-throwing, beatings and
Kara-Kari honour killings.
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Sher Afgan
Niazi provoked an uproar mainly from PPP benches as he opposed the introduction
of the bill arguing that it was contrary to the Holy Quran, which, according to
him, permitted repeated beating of disobedient women by their husbands — an
interpretation disputed by several opposition members, including some Ulema from
the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA) alliance.
“If a wife is not on the
right path, admonish her; if she does not change, then beat her; if she does not
change even then, beat her again; and if that also does not work then send her
out of the home,” he quoted the Holy Quran as saying.
PPP’s main legal
Aitzaz Ahsan, one of the 14 other sponsors of Mrs Rehman’s bill, said the
constitution guaranteed equal rights to men and women and the new legislation
sought to rectify the situation cited by the minister through a “wrong
interpretation” of the Quranic verses and that allowed “man’s barbarism over
woman”.
As PPP members pressed for a vote, Law and Justice Minister
Mohammad Wasi Zafar agreed to the reference of the bill to the house standing
committee concerned, apparently to avoid a formal test of strength between the
two sides while the ruling coalition seemed divided on the issue.
Several
ruling coalition members voted for Mrs Rehman’s bill as did the PPP for the
bills of Mrs Rafi’s draft and Ms Tariq’s Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood)
Amendment Bill, which seeks to amend the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood)
Ordinance of 1979 that was enforced by then military ruler General Mohammad
Zia-ul-Haq.
While some members of the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA)
alliance cheered Mr Niazi’s opposition to the bills of Mrs Rehman and Ms Tariq,
some others disputed the minister’s interpretation of Quranic
injunctions.
MMA’s Mrs Samia Raheel Qazi and pro-MMA Maulana Merajuddin
from the Federally Administrated Tribal Areas cited the Holy Quran’s Sura
Al-Nisa (Women) provided for admonishment of a woman destroying family life in
violation of the Sharia and a slight beating without causing any injury was
allowed only on the third stage after the husband’s counsel and separation of
beds failed to change her attitude.
___________________________________________________________________
================================================================
To
leave the list, send your request by email to:
wunrn_listserve-request@lists.wunrn.com. Thank you.