This paper reviews the gender-differentiated effect of macro-economic
policies by examining the impact of persistent revenue shortfalls on the
part of the national government in 1997-2003 on the budget allocations for
programmes that support gender equality and women’s priority public
services in selected departments. The dapartments studied are:
Department of Health (DOH)
- Department of Agriculture (DA)
- Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD)
- Department of Education (DepEd).
The study also undertakes a gender-disaggregated benefit incidence
analysis of the mainstream or untargeted expenditures of the selected
departments.
The main findings include:
- not all agencies were successful in protecting the funding for
gender / women-targeted programmes in the face of the fiscal
difficulties in 1997-2003. Some (e.g., DOH) were more successful than
others (e.g., DSWD) in this respect
- gender / women-targeted programmes were adversely affected by the
fiscal constraints during the period under study, as the overall budget
of the central government became smaller even as the budget share of
some gender / women-targeted programmes increased. Real per capita
spending on targeted programmes declined in all of the departments
included in this study
- the availability of sex-disaggregated information is lacking in many
of the programmes provided by the selected agencies.
The study concludes by emphasising that budget analysis has to be
better informed by gender analysis. It should be noted that even if there
is no gender bias in the formal policies and procedures that govern the
delivery of services of various government agencies, gender bias might
result from the informal rules, attitudes and behaviour not only of
service providers but also that of the target clientele.
[adapted from author]
Read full text |
About: Philippine Institute for Development Studies
(PIDS) |
Send this page to a friend
| |