WIDE Statement to the 50th CSW session
UN Commission on the Status of Women 2006
WIDE views the
50th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women as an important
opportunity to voice our ideas and concerns regarding following issues:
Gender
Mainstreaming:
In the framework
of the follow-up to the Fourth World Conference on Women and to the twenty-third
special session of the General Assembly entitled “Women 2000: gender equality,
development and peace for the twenty-first century’ a review of gender
mainstreaming in organisations of the UN system will take place.
WIDE welcomes
the report of the Secretary-general (E/CN.6/2006/2) that reviews the progress
made in mainstreaming a gender perspective in the development, implementation
and evaluation of national policies and programmes. We acknowledge that since
1995 many countries have developed policies and action plans on gender
mainstreaming, however, gender mainstreaming has become a buzzword and WIDE
is concerned that it is understood as only introducing gender into existing
policies. This approach will not
ensure that the transformative potential of gender mainstreaming is achieved.
WIDE wants to
remind governments that gender mainstreaming must be understood in the agreed
terms of CEDAW and the BPfA as a strategy towards transformation of unfair
gender relations and gender stereotypes, and the empowerment of women. This
includes challenging existing policy paradigms and asks for a fundamental
re-thinking of the process of policy-making and its goals.
Enhanced
participation of women in development:
A second issue
of interest to WIDE is the evaluation of the implementation of strategic
objectives and actions in the critical area of enhanced participation of
women in development: an enabling environment for achieving gender equality and
the advancement of women, taking into account, inter alia, the fields of
education, health and work.
WIDE welcomes
the report of the Secretary-General (E/CN.6/2006/12) that highlights that the
elements and dynamics of an enabling environment are context-specific and
influenced by factors such as, inter alia, the international political
situation, including peace and security issues; the global and regional economic
environment, (…). We also acknowledge that it is noted that globalisation
had presented a significant challenge to the creation of an enabling environment
for gender equality and the advancement of women. Economic liberalisation has
had uneven impacts on women’s participation in development processes. WIDE’s
particular concern is about the many ways in which neo-liberalism, including the
promotion of a ‘free’ trade regime, economic globalisation and market
liberalisation is actually counteracting an enabling environment: it has led to
the feminisation of employment, intensified exploitation of women's unpaid work
in the caring economy and has undermined the livelihood strategies of poor rural
and urban women, including migrant women, disabled and displaced women in all
areas of the world. The increasing impact of such policies on the lives and
livelihoods of women is compounded in countries of the South by the structural
inequalities between North and South. Therefore such policies play a central
role in creating an enabling environment and have to be taken into account
otherwise they can reproduce or even worsen inequality.
WIDE, in
alliance with other women’s groups working on trade, macro economic, gender and
globalisation, calls on Governments to recognise that gender aware macro
economic policy, including the application of a gender analysis of trade and its
impact on women globally, are essential if economic development partnerships are
to be made real and effective. WIDE asks for far greater economic coherence
among states, non-state actors and multilateral institutions in relation to
development cooperation and financial, monetary and trade policies, so that the
systemic inequities and power imbalances within the global economic system are
addressed.
Multi-year
programme of work:
At the CSW
meeting a new multi-year programme of work, setting out the overall
themes for the next five years (2007-2009) of the Commission on the Status of
Women will be discussed.
WIDE is very pleased that in developing the proposals for
a multi-year program of work that the Commission called on a number of regional
networks, including WIDE, to identify priorities in the follow-up to the 10-year
review and appraisal of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.
However, WIDE is concerned that the final report of this consultation is not
publicly available and that the Commission have not taken up a single priority
issue identified during the Expert Consultation[1]. WIDE believes that the voices of women’s organisations
from around the world need to be heard and that the Commission should not make
‘token’ their contribution to such debates.
WIDE believes that
women’s economic justice should be a priority for the CSW’s programme of
work in the next three years as it impacts on every aspect of a woman’s
life. The Commission recognises
that improving women’s economic status improves the economic status of their
families and their communities and that women should have equal opportunities to
achieve economic independence. However, WIDE is concerned that neo-liberalism, including the promotion of a
‘free’ trade regime, economic globalisation and market liberalisation, will not
lead to economic justice for women.
Contact
at WIDE Secretariat in Brussels:
Barbara
Specht, Information Officer, barbara@wide-network.org
Meagen
Baldwin, Executive Director, Meagen@wide-network.org
Visit
the WIDE website: www.wide-network.org
[1] WIDE was a member of the Expert Consultation alongside the Caribbean Association for Feminist Research and Action (CAFRA), the Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), the Institute for Women’s Studies in the Arab World (IWSAW), the Africa Women’s Development and communication Network (FEMNET), the Latin America and the Caribbean Committee for the Defense of Women’s Rights (CLADEM), Isis- Women’s International Cross Cultural Exchange (Isis-WICCE); and the Asia-Pacific Women’s Watch (APWW). The Expert Consultation identified economic justice, women in armed conflict, women’s human rights and access to information as priorities. Migrant women was raised by a number of participants as a priority during the interactive panel which followed the consultation.